Document

Outcome types after ACL reconstruction

Description

Conclusions: In ACLR patients there was no clinically relevant correlation between scores obtained by PROMs, a battery of functional performance tests and instrumented laxity of the knee at one-year follow-up. Therefore, one type of outcome cannot represent the others. This is an argument for always to include and report all three types of outcomes, and conclusions based on one type of outcome may not be sufficient.

Content restricted!

You need to login to see this content

Authors

Mustafa Al-Gburi

MD

Section of sports traumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg

Jakob Bredahl Kristiansen

PT

Department of Physical Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg

Karl Bang Christensen

Professor

Section for Biostatistics, Copenhagen University, Denmark.

Michael Rindom Krogsgaard

Professor

Section for sports traumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg

Our Continuous Professional Education Partners